Modern Facelift vs. Traditional: Key Differences

The evolution of facial rhytidectomy over the past few decades has completely changed the way we understand rejuvenation. At present, How modern facelifts differ from traditional methods goes far beyond a surgical technique: it involves a new philosophy, a deep knowledge of facial anatomy and a more ethical and personalized approach.

Few surgeons represent this change better than the Dr. Richer, renowned for his precision, his honesty with patients and his comprehensive understanding of the face like a system in balance.

While ancient lifts based the improvement on tightening the skin backwards, modern techniques seek to reposition deep structures to restore the natural shape and harmony of the face. This fundamental change has significantly increased the safety, naturalness and durability of the results.

Modern vs. traditional approach: a fundamental evolution

Traditional lifts were developed at a time when it was thought that sagging was exclusively a skin problem. Therefore, the procedure consisted mainly of separating large areas of the skin and pulling them backwards.

The result could be obvious, but not necessarily natural. The surgery resolved superficial wrinkles, while neglecting the tissues that actually support the face, such as facial muscles, deep fat and ligaments.

Over time, surgery evolved toward a much more complete understanding of the aging process. Today we know that the loss of support and volume occurs in several layers, and that the decline of deep tissues has a more significant impact on appearance than the skin itself.

Therefore, modern facelifts focus on repositioning ligaments, muscles and fatty compartments, rather than simply tightening the skin. This technical and conceptual difference explains why current results are more durable, expressive and harmonious.

‍

Aesthetic results: naturalness over tension

The traditional result: tight skin without deep correction

The old technique could improve the appearance of the skin, but in many cases it produced an excessively stretched effect. This was because the correction was performed where the tissue is weakest: on the skin.

By tensioning without repositioning the internal structures, expression was compromised and facial mobility was reduced. In addition, skin under traction does not maintain the result in the long term, leading to an early relapse.

The modern result: freshness, balance and natural expression

Current techniques return the face to its original position when working from the inside. Rejuvenation occurs in a three-dimensional way, not just on the surface. The result is a face that looks fresher and more rested, without losing expressiveness.

The transitions between cheeks, jaw and neck look smooth and natural, without visible tension, characteristic of old methods.

For Dr. Richer, this approach reflects something fundamental to his practice: “I don't do things just because they're in fashion, but because they're what's best for the patient.”

Advanced Anatomy: The Role of SMAS and Deep Planes

The Modern Era: SMAS, Deep Plane and Three-Dimensional Repositioning

The discovery of the SMAS (Superficial Musculo-Aponeurotic System) marked a before and after in facelifts. Surgeons understood that, to obtain real and lasting results, they must act on the internal structure that supports the skin.

Modern facelifts, including the SMAS facelift and the deep plane, work directly on these deep layers, while respecting the ligaments and vascularity of the face.

The Lifting Deep Plane, a technique that Dr. Richer is fluent in, makes it possible to mobilize muscles, fat and connective tissues as a unit.

This approach offers a more complete correction, especially in cheeks, nasolabial grooves and the middle third of the face. It is a more advanced technique, but also the one that provides the most natural results because it follows the true anatomical lines of the face.

Durability: Why modern results last much longer

The surface traction of traditional lifts had a limited lifespan. In many cases, patients began to see their sagging return within two to five years, as the skin doesn't have enough strength to hold the tissues in place.

Modern methods correct aging right from the start. By repositioning deep structures, not only does the result look better, but it also holds longer.

Patients typically enjoy a rejuvenated appearance for ten to fifteen years, and subsequent aging occurs more naturally. For Dr. Richer, durability is not a product of “stretching more”, but of restoring each structure to its correct anatomical location.

Recovery and Security: Less Invasion, Fewer Risks

In the past, lifts involved extensive skin peeling, increased bleeding risks, prolonged swelling, and a considerably longer recovery time. Modern facelifts are safer because they preserve irrigation and reduce tissue trauma.

Today, most patients recover more quickly. Inflammation is controlled, bruises are milder and scars become virtually imperceptible over time.

This precision not only improves safety; it also improves the emotional experience of the patient, who feels more comfortable, calmer and better accompanied during their recovery process.

Comparison between the two methods: modern vs traditional

Surgical approach

The most obvious difference between the two methods starts with the starting point of the surgery. The traditional lifting was built around a simple concept: stretching the skin to soften sagging.

Modern procedures, on the other hand, are based on a much deeper understanding of facial anatomy. Instead of tensing, they focus on reposition internal tissues, muscles, ligaments and deep fat, returning them to their natural location. This change in surgical philosophy completely transforms the quality of the result.

Naturalness of the result

Naturalness is perhaps the difference that patients value most today. The old methods, based on surface traction, could leave a stiff or tense expression that betrayed surgery.

Modern techniques work from within, following the natural planes of the face, allowing preserve expressions, the patient's mobility and facial identity. Rejuvenation is noticeable, but not felt forced.

Duration of the effect

Durability is another point where modernity shows its advantage. The results of traditional lifting tended to fade more quickly because the skin, being a fragile and elastic tissue, does not maintain tension over time.

On the other hand, when deep facial support is properly restored, the effect is maintained for years. Today's facelifts offer rejuvenation much longer, with stable changes that age harmoniously.

Recovery process

Traditional recovery used to be longer and more demanding due to large skin flaps and greater surface manipulation. Today, thanks to more precise and tissue-friendly techniques, inflammation decreases faster, the risk of bleeding is lower and the patient's experience is much more bearable. The recovery of the modern facelift is faster, more comfortable and less traumatic, allowing for a smoother return to daily life.

Type of final result

Finally, the general appearance of the face after surgery also changes between the two approaches. Traditional lifts offered “two-dimensional” improvement: the skin looked smoother, but the structure of the face didn't really change.

Modern techniques allow for an effect three-dimensional, which regains volume, definition in the cheeks and jaw, and the natural projection of the middle third. This creates complete, balanced rejuvenation, not just tight skin.

Contemporary Facial Rejuvenation Techniques

SMAS facelift

It works on the muscle-aponeurotic layer. It is a versatile option that corrects the sagging of the middle and lower third without altering natural expression.

Deep Plane Facelift

It is the most advanced technique and one of the most complex to execute correctly. It mobilizes deep tissues following their natural planes. Its ability to rejuvenate without stiffness makes it one of Dr. Richer's favorite methods.

Mini facelift

It is aimed at patients with early signs of flaccidity. It requires smaller incisions and a shorter recovery. It's not a substitute for a deep lift, but it's useful for certain cases.

Volume restoration with fat grafting

Aging also involves loss of volume. Lipofilling restores softness to sunken areas such as cheeks or furrows, achieving overall rejuvenation. Dr. Richer uses it when it provides harmony, always prioritizing naturalness over any trend.

Combining Procedures: Dr. Richer's Comprehensive Philosophy

Unlike many surgeons who treat each area of the face as a separate procedure, Dr. Richer conceives a facelift as an intervention that should restore harmony to the entire face.

For this reason, evaluate whether it is necessary to complement the lift with procedures such as blepharoplasty, eyebrow lift or chin refinement, always with the objective of preserving balance, not increasing the bill.

His practice is guided by honesty. If a patient is not a good candidate, he says so clearly. If an additional procedure will not be beneficial, he simply does not recommend it. This ethic has earned him the respect of both patients and colleagues who frequently consult him in complex cases.

FAQs

What's the most important difference between a modern and a traditional facelift?

The modern one works on deep layers such as SMAS, while the traditional one is limited to tightening the skin. This makes current results more natural and last much longer.

Does a modern facelift avoid the stretched look?

Yes. By repositioning internal structures instead of pulling on the skin, facial expression is preserved. The result is fresh and natural.

Who is a candidate for a modern facelift?

People with moderate or marked sagging of the cheeks, jaw, and neck. Dr. Richer determines in consultation if there really is a surgical benefit for each case.

How long do the results of a modern facelift last?

Usually between ten and fifteen years old, thanks to deep tissue correction. Over time, the face continues to age, but in a more harmonious way.

Choosing modernity, security and harmony with Dr. Richer

Understand how do modern facelifts differ from traditional methods allows you to make informed and realistic decisions. Modern surgery does not seek to tighten; it seeks to restore. It is not intended to change who you are, but rather to restore your facial balance, freshness and natural identity.

And it is at this point where Dr. Richer's work stands out: it combines advanced technique, professional ethics and a profoundly artistic vision of facial rejuvenationl. Its precision, its commitment to safety and its respect for anatomy make its patients not only look transformed, but also profoundly confident in their choice.